Legal Opinion

Anello v. Kuss

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1956PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.

The plaintiff heretofore moved to strike certain allegations contained in the answer of the defendant. The motion was granted, with leave to the defendant to serve a correct amended answer. Within due time, the defendant served an amended answer. The plaintiff promptly returned the new. pleading, with a notice of rejection to the effect that it did not comply with the order which had granted leave. The defendant moves before me to compel the plaintiff to accept service.

The practice of rejecting pleadings has been allowed by the courts’ where there has not been a proper verification, when the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Robertson v. Rockland Cemetery Improvement Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  2. Mann v. Press Publishing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  3. Hubert v. ApostoloffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  4. Thoma v. KoeppenCity of New York Municipal Court · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reiner v. KaneNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Rubinraut v. Federico Causo Consignataria Sociedad AnonimaNew York Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API