Legal Opinion
Shaughnesy v. Tax Tribunal
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided January 14, 1985No. 68612, (Calendar No. 20)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.
The plaintiffs are residents and taxpayers of the City of Dearborn who, on September 1, 1981, individually and purportedly as members of a class, filed a complaint in the Court of Appeals seeking an order of superintending control over the Tax Tribunal. The Court of Appeals dismissed the plaintiffs’ complaint in a one-sentence order, apparently concluding that superintending control is an inappropriate remedy in this case. Because we have determined that the plaintiffs are entitled to maintain an action for superintending control, we reverse.
The issue presented for our decision is the narrow…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Genesee Prosecutor v. Genesee Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- Wikman v. City of NoviMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Giddings v. BlackerMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Matter of HagueMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Great Lakes Div. v. City of EcorseMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Great Lakes Division of National Steel Corp. v. City of EcorseMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Jefferson Schools v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- WPW Acquisition Co. v. City of TroyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
- Wayne County Prosecutor v. Recorder's Court JudgeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.