Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Lighting & Power Services, Inc. v. Interface Construction Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided January 29, 2009No. 07-3678PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOKEN, Chief Judge.
When the government awarded Interface Construction Corp. (“Interface”) a substantial contract to renovate portions of a federal building in St. Louis, the Miller Act required that Interface obtain a payment bond “for the protection of all persons supplying labor and material in carrying out the work provided for in the contract.” 40 U.S.C. § 3131(b)(2). Interface subcontracted electrical work to Henderson Electrical Systems, LLC (“Henderson”), which in turn contracted with Lighting and Power Services, Inc. (“LPS”), to perform that work. When Interface and Henderson ignored…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- F. D. Rich Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Industrial Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Dunn Industrial Group, Inc. v. City of Sugar CreekSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Benkelman, NE v. Baseline Engineering Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. International Fidelity Insurance Co.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2017
- US for Use of Light. & Power v. Interface Const.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Dennis Hecker v. Randall SeaverCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Bohanon v. Experian Information Solutions IncDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.