Legal Opinion

Tackett v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 13, 1994No. A93A1911PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Judge.

Anthony Ray Tackett and Mary Ann Adams entered pleas of nolo contendere to charges of violating the Georgia Controlled Substances Act. As part of their negotiated plea, the prosecutor and the trial court agreed to an express reservation of appellants’ right to bring this appeal from the denial of their motions to suppress. See Claffey v. State, 209 Ga. App. 455 (433 SE2d 441) (1993); Mims v. State, 201 Ga. App. 277, 278 (1) (410 SE2d 824) (1991). Tackett and Adams enumerate three errors from the trial court’s failure to grant their motions to suppress.

The court held a hearing…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. State v. StephensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  3. Gary v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
  4. Boatright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  5. Mims v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Urapo-Sanchez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  2. Chatham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  3. Watts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  4. Mickey Chatham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API