Legal Opinion

Chatham v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 15, 2013No. A13A0789PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Phipps, Chief Judge.

Mickey Howard Chatham was indicted for three drug offenses. He filed a motion to suppress evidence seized from his residence pursuant to a search warrant, contending that the warrant was issued without probable cause. Chatham filed this interlocutory appeal from the denial of his motion to suppress. For the reasons that follow, we reverse.

“A search warrant will only issue upon facts sufficient to show probable cause that a crime is being committed or has been committed.”1

In determining probable cause for the issuance of a search warrant, the issuing magistrate must make a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. State v. PalmerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  3. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  4. Sullivan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  5. Fiallo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nichols v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  2. WOODS v. the STATE.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API