Legal Opinion

Kruegel v. Murphy Bolanz

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 5, 1915No. 7466PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRasbury, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the district judge refusing to sustain a motion to adjudge the district clerk of Dallas county in contempt of court for refusing to issue pluries execution upon the judgment in the cause in which it was filed.

The evidence and sworn pleading disclose the following undisputed and material facts: On March 17, 1894, in the case of Herman Kruegel v. Murphy & Bolanz, pending in said Fourteenth district court of Dallas county, judgment was rendered in favor of Kruegel and against J. P. Murphy and Charles F. Bolanz for $1,318.60. The judgment provided that it…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pecos & Northern Texas Railway Co. v. CoffmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  2. Kruegel v. RawlinsTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Kruegel v. Murphy & BolanzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  4. Kruegel v. RawlinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Lockney v. LivesayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  2. Byrne v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API