Johnson v. White
Michigan Supreme Court
1DissentArcher, J.
The majority holds that the Court of Appeals was precluded from deciding certain evidentiary issues on remand from this Court because of the law-of-the-case doctrine. I *62disagree. I would hold that this Court’s order remanding the case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration included jurisdiction to decide the evidentiary issues. Determination of the applicability of the jury instruction at issue necessarily included the evaluation of all arguably relevant evidence. In turn, this evaluation required a decision whether such evidence was properly admitted.
The evidence presented at trial…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gillett v. Michigan United Traction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Johnson v. CorbetMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Javis v. Board of Education of the School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- CAF Investment Co. v. Saginaw TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- People v. PetrellaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.