Legal Opinion

Woods v. Monticello Development Co.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided December 2, 1982No. 80CA0929Published

1Opinion of the Court

BERMAN, Judge.

Following the buyers’ default on an installment land contract and declaration of forfeiture by the seller, the buyers sued for and were denied the rights of equitable redemption and cure by the trial court. The buyers appeal, and we reverse and remand.

In 1973, Samuel and Donna Woods (buyers) contracted to purchase a mobile home site from Monticello Development Company. The buyers paid $825 down and agreed to payments of $89.75 per month. Under the terms of the contract, the seller was to retain title until the full purchase price of $16,152.50 was paid. In the event of a 20-day…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Smith v. GENERAL FINANCE CORPORATION OF GEORGIASupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  2. Westinghouse Credit Corporation v. Joe R. Shelton, Sr., an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
  3. MacFadden v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Cobb v. Midwest Recovery Bureau Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. Morris v. WeigleIndiana Supreme Court · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API