Legal Opinion
State v. Condran
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided October 7, 1998No. 1152-97, 1153-97PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLEE’S PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
2Per curiam
Appellee filed an application for writ of habeas corpus contending he was entitled to discharge because he was indicted outside the “next term of court” as set out in Art. 32.01, V.A.C.C.P. After a hearing, the trial judge ordered the indictment dismissed with prejudice. The State appealed and the court of appeals reversed the trial court’s order dismissing the indictment against appellee and remanded the causes for trial. State v. Condran, 951 S.W.2d 178 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1997). We granted review to determine the correctness of that…
3Cases cited1 opinion
4Cited by31 opinions
- Lopez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
- Cameron v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
- Ex Parte Martin, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
- Ex Parte YoungCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Department of Family and Protective Services v. Travis Reid Dickensheets, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.