Legal Opinion

Fabrizio v. Fabrizio

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 16, 1946PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtElls, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien on premises owned by the defendant DeBenigno. It was alleged that Henry Fabrizio, the other defendant, claimed to have two mechanics’ liens on the land. The resulting pleadings were complicated and do not require detailed discussion. The trial court decided that the plaintiff did not acquire a lien. He did not appeal. Henry Fabrizio did not pursue his lien claims but relied upon a cross-complaint to recover damages from DeBenigno for breach of contract. The court decided that Henry Fabrizio himself breached the agreement and…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. M. Shapiro & Son Construction Co. v. BattagliaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  2. Rowley v. SalladinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  3. INGRASSIA CONST. CO. v. Vernon Tp. Bd. of Educ.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
  4. United States ex rel. Endicott Enterprises Inc. v. Star Brite Construction Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1994
  5. US FOR USE OF ENDICOTT ENT. v. Star BriteDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API