Legal Opinion

Flamingo Motel & Restaurant, Inc. v. Port of Portland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 26, 1972No. 364-219PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from the trial court’s decree that Ordinance No. 146① of defendant, The Port of Portland, was valid and enforceable against the plaintiffs.

*603The plaintiffs are five motels, a commercial parking enterprise and an automobile rental company affected by this ordinance. They do not solicit business or maintain physical facilities on the airport premises, but provide courtesy cars to pick up customers at the airport when this service is requested by the customer. No charge is made for this service.

The Port of Portland (hereafter referred to as Port) is a municipal corporation…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Evansville-Vanderburgh Airport Authority District v. Delta Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Western Heights Land Corp. v. City of Fort CollinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  3. CROFT v. LambertOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Cox v. McNamaraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  5. Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Westrac, Inc. v. Walker Field, Colorado, Public Airport AuthorityColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Williams v. SchrunkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  3. Petrol Stops Northwest v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  4. Port of Portland v. BilicCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API