Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Davidson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 10, 1981No. 79-2-384, CA 19277Published

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Wife appeals the denial of her motion to vacate a dissolution decree, contending that due to fraudulent representations made by husband and his witnesses the trial court was deceived as to the value of the marital estate and that the resulting property division was inequitable.

At the dissolution trial wife presented evidence that the real property, the major marital, asset, was worth $225,000. Wife’s witness, a licensed real estate appraiser, testified that his appraisal was based in part on certain zoning changes which were planned but not yet effected. Husband and his witnesses, who were…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harder v. HarderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  2. In re the Marriage of HansenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API