Harder v. Harder

Plaintiff moved to set aside a property settlement agreement and a divorce decree incorporating that agreement on the ground that the primary asset of the parties, i.e., the interests of defendant in certain family corporations, was not included or considered in the agreement and decree by reason of misrepresentations by the defendant and his attorney. On de novo review, we agree with the opinion of the trial judge, which we adopt as our own:

"I find the facts of this case to be as follows:

"The petitioner and respondent were married on December 2, 1961. Throughout the greater part of the…