Legal Opinion
Hardware Mutual Casualty Company v. Bewayne Jones and Louis Jones
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided April 21, 1964No. 9032_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNSWORTH, Circuit Judge.
Because the jury received less guidance from the Court than was needed to enable it to resolve the factual issues submitted to itrwe conclude that a new trial is appropriate.
The question generally relates to the coverage of an automobile dealer’s liability insurance policy on an automobile used by one of the dealer’s employees, and the principal factual issue was whether or not the use was with the permission of the dealer. Some reference to the particular facts is required.
Automoville, Inc. and a partnership doing business as Phillips Bros. Automoville were the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pacific Automobile Insurance v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Company v. AndersonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1958
- The Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. HarlowSupreme Court of Virginia · 1950
- Nationwide Insurance v. StormSupreme Court of Virginia · 1959
- Hardware Mut. Casualty Co. v. WendlingerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Field v. Transcontinental InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1998
- Murry v. Bankers Fire & Marine Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- Hardware Mutual Casualty Company v. Bewayne Jones, Infant, and Louis JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966