Legal Opinion
United States v. Gloss
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 17, 2011No. 10-5417PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTTON, Circuit Judge.
Anthony Gloss appeals a 180-month sentence required by the Armed Career Criminal Act. He presents one argument: that the district court should not have sentenced him under the Act because his Tennessee conviction for facilitation of aggravated robbery does not amount to a “violent felony.” We disagree and affirm.
I
In August 2009, Gloss pled guilty to one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm. See 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). The PSR recommended that Gloss be sentenced under the Armed Career Criminal Act on account of two Tennessee convictions for violent…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Begay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Chambers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Sykes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- State v. ParkerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
- United States v. Dale M. Preston, A/K/A Jami Mansour ShabazzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. Ramone AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Sathon EvansCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Lassend v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
- United States v. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Todd D'Antoni v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.