Legal Opinion

Kinard v. MOORE

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 13, 1951No. 16561PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

220 S.C. 376 (1951)

68 S.E.2d 321

KINARD

v.

MOORE ET AL.

16561

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

November 13, 1951.

Messrs. Butler & Moore, of Spartanburg, for Appellants, Margaret Caroline Moore et al., and Butler & Moore, of Spartanburg, and Uzzell & DuMont, of Asheville, N.C., for Appellants, Corinne Moore Pruit et al.

Mr. E.W. Johnson, of Spartanburg, for Appellants, Kennedy T. Moore et al.

Messrs. Daniel, Russell & Means, and Jesse W. Boyd, of Spartanburg, for Defendants-Respondents, John McDowell Moore et al.

Messrs. Perrin, Ward & Perrin, of Spartanburg, for Plaintiff-Respondent, Mary Louise Moore…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. ReedySupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
  2. Lawton v. Lower Main Street BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  3. Kinard v. MooreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Berkeley County School District v. South Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  2. Consumer Advocate v. South Carolina Department of InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
  3. BERKELEY COUNTY SCH. v. Dept. of Rev.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  4. Bynum v. BynumSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  5. Synovus Bank v. SCDORCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API