Kinard v. MOORE
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
220 S.C. 376 (1951)
68 S.E.2d 321
KINARD
v.
MOORE ET AL.
16561
Supreme Court of South Carolina.
November 13, 1951.
Messrs. Butler & Moore, of Spartanburg, for Appellants, Margaret Caroline Moore et al., and Butler & Moore, of Spartanburg, and Uzzell & DuMont, of Asheville, N.C., for Appellants, Corinne Moore Pruit et al.
Mr. E.W. Johnson, of Spartanburg, for Appellants, Kennedy T. Moore et al.
Messrs. Daniel, Russell & Means, and Jesse W. Boyd, of Spartanburg, for Defendants-Respondents, John McDowell Moore et al.
Messrs. Perrin, Ward & Perrin, of Spartanburg, for Plaintiff-Respondent, Mary Louise Moore…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. ReedySupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
- Lawton v. Lower Main Street BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
- Kinard v. MooreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
3Cited by5 opinions
- Berkeley County School District v. South Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- Consumer Advocate v. South Carolina Department of InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
- BERKELEY COUNTY SCH. v. Dept. of Rev.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- Bynum v. BynumSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
- Synovus Bank v. SCDORCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2024