Legal Opinion

Consumer Advocate v. South Carolina Department of Insurance

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided February 22, 2012No. 4944PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKonduros, J.

The Consumer Advocate for the State of South Carolina appeals the Administrative Law Court’s (ALC’s) ruling that the South Carolina Department of Insurance (DOI) was not required to publish notice of a proposed change in loss costs rates for workers’ compensation insurance because the overall change was a decrease. We reverse.

FACTS

Workers’ compensation rates are composed of two components: loss costs and loss-costs multipliers. Loss costs are the medical expenses and lost wages component of the rate. The loss-costs multiplier represents the insurer’s expenses and profit. Each insurer files…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Kiriakides v. United Artists Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  3. Hitachi Data Systems Corp. v. LeathermanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  4. State v. SweatSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  5. Bennett v. Sullivan's Island Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Synovus Bank v. SCDORCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API