Legal Opinion
Silberberg v. Citizens Water Supply Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 15, 1921PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Motion for an injunction pendente lite.
1Opinion of the CourtFaber, J.
The defendant is a wafer company organized in 1893 under the Transportation Corporations Law, and supplying water to the inhabitants of certain sections of Queens and an adjoining county. In *597August, 1905, the defendant established certain rates and charges for water supplied, which remained in effect until January 1,1921. Prior to that date, however, and on November 20, 1920, the defendant notified its consumers of its election to terminate the agreements between it and them on December 31, 1920, and of the establishment of a new schedule of rates and charges, to become effective on and after…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- San Diego Land & Town Co. v. National CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- City of Mount Vernon v. New York Inter Urban Water Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Morrell v. . Brooklyn Borough Gas Co. No. 1New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- New York Interurban Water Co. v. City of Mt. VernonNew York Supreme Court · 1920
- Morrell v. Brooklyn Borough Gas Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Town of Mamaroneck v. New York Interurban Water Co.New York Supreme Court · 1925
- City of New York v. Citizens Water Supply Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Huppuch v. Spring Brook Water Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923