Norris Oil Co. v. Von Glahn
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
The judgment herein quieted title in respondent whose interest is a leasehold estate. The court found that the two leases theretofore executed by respondent to appellants had terminated prior to the commencement of this action and the latter now have no interest in the lands described.
Appellants contend here that the default under the lease resulting from their failure to commence drilling operations within a year from the date of the writing and their failure to tender rentals within the year did not ipso facto terminate their rights. They claim that the leases could be terminated only upon…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wilcox v. WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Richfield Oil Corp. v. BloomfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. Amalgamated Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1923
- Carlisle v. LadyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Alexander v. OatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Montana-Fresno Oil Co. v. PowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Walston v. Flintridge Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Fritsch v. FisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Griggs v. Parsons Leasing, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000