Legal Opinion
Gradolph v. Ricou
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided February 11, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBuford, C. J.
—-In this case appellee instituted suit to reform and foreclose a mortgage. Amongst others, the appellant, Gradolph, was a party defendant. The mortgage sought to be foreclosed as it was drawn and recorded contained a void description but, following the attempted description, this language appeared in the mortgage:
“This is a second mortgage following mortgage given by R. R. Ricou to R. L. Goodwin for $3,220.00 dated March 10th, 1924, on or before one and two years at 8% interest, payable semi-annually.”
The record shows that a mortgage from R. R. Ricou and his wife, J. Gertrude Ricou, to R. L.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bevans v. YoungNew York Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by5 opinions
- Yaist v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Sickler v. Melbourne State BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
- Air Flow Heating and Air Conditioning, Inc. v. BakerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
- In Re Chateau Royale, Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida · 1980
- Neves v. FlannerySupreme Court of Florida · 1933