Legal Opinion

State of Florida, Department of etc. v. B.C., the mother and C.S., the father

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 18, 2016No. 1D15-3328PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMakar, J.

Termination of the constitutionally-protected parental right is permissible only if it is shown that “reunification with the parent poses a substantial risk of signifi- c.ant harm to the child” and that termination is the “least restrictive means” of achieving the State’s interest of “protecting the child from serious harm.” Padgett v. Dep't of HRS, 577 So.2d 565, 571. (Fla.1991). The trial judge concluded — based on clear and convincing evidence — that termination of parental rights was warranted and in the manifest best, interests of the children involved.- He nonetheless concluded that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Padgett v. Dept. of Health & Rehab. ServicesSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  2. State Ex Rel. Sparks v. ReevesSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  3. A.J. v. K.A.O.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  4. Statewide Guardian Ad Litem Program v. A.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  5. CM v. Department of Children and FamiliesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. S.M., etc. v. Florida Department of Children and FamiliesSupreme Court of Florida · 2016
  2. Guardian Ad Litem Program v. C.W. (In re X.W.)District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API