Kaplan v. Birger
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
Summary judgment was erroneously granted in favor of the plaintiff, who sought the return of a deposit under a purchase and sale agreement on the ground that the sellers (defendants) were unable to “convey a good and clear record and marketable title [to “[s]aid premises”], free from encumbrances,” as required by the agreement. The plaintiff claims that the premises to be conveyed are “subject to a Taking by the City of Newton of easement for laying and maintaining main drain and common sewer through Baldpate Hill Road” and also subject to “an easement... [taken by the city of Newton] with…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mead v. ParkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Danforth v. ChandlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Schon v. Odd Fellows Building Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Siegel v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
- Imper Realty Corp. v. RissMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. WilksAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- People v. RichAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- National Union Fire Insurance v. GreenbergMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979