Legal Opinion
State v. Schmutz
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided March 31, 2003No. 24742PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KENNETH W. SHRUM, Judge.
Jeffrey A. Schmutz (“Defendant”) appeals his conviction for driving while intoxicated in violation of § 577.010, RSMo (2000). 1 Defendant alleges the trial court committed reversible error when it overruled his motion to suppress and admitted the evidence at trial over Defendant’s objections. Defendant claims such evidence should have been excluded at trial because the police officer had no reasonable suspicion to stop Defendant’s vehicle. We agree. We reverse.
Because Defendant filed a motion to suppress and properly objected to the admission of the evidence at trial,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. David Lee GreenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. AbelnMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. PeeryMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. CainMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. McIntoshMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.