Legal Opinion
Grigsby Brandford & Co., Inc. v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 28, 1994No. Civ. A. 94-2012PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM — OPINION
KESSLER, District Judge.
I. Introduction and Procedural History
Plaintiffs, joint venture partners Grigsby Brandford and Company, Inc. and A.H. Williams and Company, Inc. (“GB/AHW”), have brought the instant action challenging the Secretary of Education’s selection of the firm of Pryor McClendon Counts & Co., Inc. (“PMC”) as the Designated Bonding Authority (“DBA”) for the Historically Black Colleges and Universities (“HBCU”) Capital Financing Program. Plaintiffs claim that the Secretary’s decision violates the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) because it was arbitrary…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Public Citizen v. United States Department of JusticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. ClintonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1995
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. ShalalaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- Varicon International v. Office of Personnel ManagementDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- Corel Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. v. BarshefskyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.