Legal Opinion

DeCordova & Son v. Bahn

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1889No. 2096PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Blanco. Tried'below before Hon. A. W. Moursund. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Hobby, Judge.

Suit by appellants to recover $1000 commissions alleged to be due them by appellee for the sale of lots numbers 1, 2,3, and 4, in block number 30, in the city of Austin, owned by appellee.

Appellants’ case as made by the testimony is that appellee sometime, prior to May 10, 1886, entered into a verbal contract with them by the. terms of which lots numbers 1, 2, 3, and 4 in said block were placed in appellants’ hands for sale without limitation as to the time in which sale was to be made. If appellants sold lot 4 for $5000 they were to be allowed 5 per cent commission. If all of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kock v. EmmerlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  2. Harrell v. ZimplemanTexas Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pryor v. JollyTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Donnan v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
  3. O'Brien v. GillelandTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. McNeny v. RadfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  5. Vickrey v. LefmannCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API