Legal Opinion

Estate of Austin v. Snead

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 29, 2013No. SC 92388PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARY R. RUSSELL, Judge.

A personal representative of a decedent’s estate failed to provide actual notice of the probate proceeding to children whom the decedent was alleged to have sexually abused. Because of the failure to notify the children, their claims1 against the estate were filed beyond the statutory six-month requirement found in section 473.360.2 The children’s father, their sole custodian and guardian, filed claims against the estate, which were dismissed. This Court finds that the children’s due process rights were violated by the dismissal of their claims because they were…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Lynch v. LynchSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Emilee Williams, Appellant/Cross-Respondent v. Mercy Clinic Springfield Communities, f/k/a St. John's Clinic, Inc., Respondent/Cross-Appellant.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2019
  2. A.F., by and through her next friend L.F. v. Hazelwood School District, Brenda Rone and Elizabeth BrandsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Paul M. Lang and Allison M. Boyer v. Dr. Patrick GoldsworthySupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
  4. Richard Brown v. Susan Brown-ThillMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Session v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API