Legal Opinion · Dissent

Middleton v. Middleton

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided April 4, 2018No. CV–17–738Published

1DissentN. Mark Klappenbach, Judge

I dissent because the trial court abused its discretion in not permitting Elvis and Brittney Middleton (collectively "Elvis") to have the pleadings conform to the proof regarding the statute of limitations. In short, Arkansas Rule of Civil Procedure 15 expressly permits such amendments even after judgment, Rule 15 is designed to be liberally applied, the opposing side argued only that it was late in the litigation, the opposing side presented the evidence establishing that the statute of limitations had run, and the opposing side failed to demonstrate how it would have tried the case any…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Felton v. Rebsamen Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  2. Seth v. St. Edward Mercy Medical CenterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  3. Turner v. StewartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Arkansas Lottery Commission v. Alpha MarketingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  5. Hope v. HopeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API