Legal Opinion
Nozzi v. Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 25, 2011No. 09-55588PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The memorandum disposition and concurrence filed on March 21, 2011, are hereby withdrawn. The clerk shall file the attached memorandum disposition and concurrence in their place.
The parties shall have fourteen days from entry of the superseding memorandum disposition to file petitions for rehear*541ing or petitions for rehearing en banc in the above-captioned matter.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
MEMORANDUM **
Plaintiffs Michael Nozzi and Nidia Pe-laez, putative class representatives of recipients of federal housing assistance payments under the Section 8 Housing Voucher Program, 42 U.S.C. § 1437f(o), and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Atkins v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Nozzi v. Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- D.V. v. City of SunnyvaleDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Zimbelman v. Southern Nevada Regional Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2015
- Drummer v. Southern Nevada Regional Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025
- L.F. v. City of StocktonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.