Legal Opinion
Zimbelman v. Southern Nevada Regional Housing Authority
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided June 2, 2015No. Case No. 2:13-cv-02143-APG-VCFPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order On Motions for Summary Judgment
ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Edward Zimbelman applied for housing from defendants Southern Nevada *1150Regional Housing Authority and John Hill (the “Housing Authority”). When he filled out the Housing Authority’s application, Zimbelman noted he was a registered sex offender. Although the Housing Authority does not permit registered sex offenders into its housing program, it admitted Zimbelman.
After he had lived in his home for seven months, the Housing Authority sent Zimbelman a notice that he was being terminated from the housing program because…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Robin Orr v. Bank of America, Nt & SaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Long v. District of Columbia Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Bostic v. District of Columbia Housing AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- Shannon v. Commissioner of HousingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- Shannon v. Commissioner of HousingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016