Legal Opinion

Erickson v. Magill

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1986No. 85-121PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAPER, Justice, Retired.

A jury returned a verdict finding that defendant Magill (appellee) intentionally interfered with a contract between the plaintiffs Ericksons (appellants) and buyers of real estate (McLennans); that appellee Ma-gill breached a real estate agent’s duty to appellants; and that appellants should recover damages in the sum of $25,000 and a statutory penalty in the sum of $7,125, for violation of statutory duties, against appel-lee Magill and appellee Key Real Estate Company (Key), the owner of Key being the real estate broker for whom appellee Magill was a real estate…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hagar v. MobleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  2. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC. v. HolsoWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Carey v. JacksonWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Cody v. AtkinsWyoming Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. ShraderWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Four Nines Gold, Inc. v. 71 Const., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Inter-Mountain Threading, Inc. v. Baker Hughes Tubular Services, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Triton Coal Co. v. Husman, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. ShirleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1998

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API