Legal Opinion

Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Shirley

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1998No. 94-166PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

In this case we analyze our jurisprudential rules relating to punitive damages in light of the due process requirements set forth in BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore, 517 US. 559, 116 S.Ct. 1589, 134 L.Ed.2d 809 (1996). The jury awarded compensatory damages to Barbara Shirley and Darol Shirley (the Shirleys) in the aggregate amount of $6,400 for the tort of breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing by Farmers Insurance Exchange (Farmers). The disposi-tive issue under the law of our state is whether the Shirleys proved they suffered substantial other economic damages…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Anderson v. Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Bertelsen v. Allstate Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Cornhusker Casualty Company v. SkajCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  3. Alexander v. MedunaWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Lompe v. Sunridge Partners, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  5. Prancing Antelope I, LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company Chris Shannon and Cynthia G. Bloomquist v. Saratoga Inn Overlook Homeowners Association, Inc., a Wyoming nonprofit corporationWyoming Supreme Court · 2021

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API