Legal Opinion

Chung Mee Restaurant Co. v. Healy

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 6, 1934PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWoodbury, J.

The above enactments are not designed for the production of revenue for the state or municipality. The statute is designed to regulate the conduct of persons who attend public dances; the ordinance, to regulate the places where such functions are held.

Only two questions are here presented. First, have the state and municipality authority to regulate such matters, and, second, is the sort of function which the petitioner proposes to conduct within the meaning of the enactments? We are of the opinion that both of these questions must be answered in the affirmative.

Under the police power the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. Drake Hotel Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1916
  2. People v. RoyalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  3. People v. CampbellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  2. Hudson Circle Servicenter, Inc. v. KearnySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  3. Redlands Foothill Groves v. JacobsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1940
  4. Connecticut Theatrical Corp. v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
  5. Flower Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API