Legal Opinion

Rinderknecht v. Maricopa County Employees Merit System

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 28, 1974No. 1 CA-CIV 2092PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

This case was first heard by the Marico-pa County Merit System Commission on March 28, 1971 to review appellant’s termination of employment as a deputy sheriff. After a ruling adversed to him, appellant, pursuant to A.R.S. § 11-356(D) which provides for judicial review in accordance with A.R.S. § 12-901 et seq., filed a complaint in the Superior Court of Maricopa County on April 30, 1971. In his complaint, appellant demanded a trial de novo under A.R.S. § 12-910. The trial de novo was granted. Appellant then filed a motion in limine to suppress all testimony and evidence…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sims v. Collection Division of the Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Selectmen of Framingham v. MUN. COURT THE CT., BOSTONMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Widomski v. CHIEF OF POLICE OF BALTIMORE CTY.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  4. City of New Brunswick v. SpeightsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  5. Miller v. City of Little RockCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API