Legal Opinion

Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. Reserve Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 31, 1978No. 77-1479PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mejda

This case involves an interlocutory appeal from the granting of an injunction. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1975, ch. 110A, par. 307.) The underlying controversy concerns a dispute between the plaintiff-insured, Chicago & Eastern Illinois R.R. (C&EI), and 13 defendant-insurers arising from the settling of a lawsuit against C&EI. Most of the defendant insurance companies paid their proportionate share of the settlement; however, they did so under a full reservation of rights. C&EI then filed an action against its insurers seeking a declaratory judgment that it had not breached its various insurance…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Donovan v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. General Atomic Co. v. FelterSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Royal League v. KavanaghIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Barco Manufacturing Co. v. WrightIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Illinois Life Insurance v. PrentissIllinois Supreme Court · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pfaff v. Chrysler Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. Reserve InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  3. American Re-Insurance Co. v. MGIC Investment Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  4. Shodeen v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  5. Pfaff v. Chrysler Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API