Rickerson Roller Mill Co. v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railroad
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to superior court of Grand Rapids. (Parrish, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.
The plaintiff in this case sues to recover the value of goods shipped over the defendant’s road to Joplin, in the state of Missouri.
The plaintiff’s right of action is based on the claim that the defendant failed to comply with the contract of shipment, and delivered the goods in question without the production of the bill of lading, whereby the plaintiff was dam*111aged in the sum of $2,099.95. The trial of the cause was had in the superior court of Grand Eapids before a jury, and a verdict was directed for the defendant.
The essential facts to a correct understanding of the case, hot disputed,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Detroit & Bay City Railway Co. v. McKenzieMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by7 opinions
- Smith v. American Express Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Black v. WalterMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Sturges v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Pennsylvania Co. v. DicksonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903
- Taffe v. Oregon RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.