Legal Opinion

State v. Mello

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided September 16, 1993No. 92-226PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, J.

The defendant, Richard Mello, was convicted of two counts of aggravated felonious sexual assault and two counts of felonious sexual assault after a jury trial in Superior Court (Dalianis, J.). His sole argument on appeal is that the trial court violated New Hampshire Rule of Evidence 608 by allowing the State to call a rebuttal witness to introduce extrinsic evidence to impeach the defendant’s testimony. We affirm.

The defendant was tried on charges that he had sexually abused the eleven-year-old daughter of his girlfriend. He testified and denied the allegations. During direct examination he…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Appeal of BosselaitSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  2. In re Eduardo L.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  3. State v. ParraSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  4. State v. SullivanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  5. State v. HopkinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. VandebogartSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  2. State v. Zeta Chi FraternitySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  3. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  4. State v. MacRaeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  5. State v. GonzalezSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API