Legal Opinion

Audio Visual Innovations, Inc. v. Spiessbach

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 16, 2013No. 2D12-5874PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SILBERMAN, Judge.

Audio Visual Innovations, Inc. (AVI), seeks review of the order denying its motion to compel arbitration of Michael G. Spiessbach’s claim for retaliatory discharge which was filed pursuant to section 440.205, Florida Statutes (2011). AVI argues that the trial court erroneously determined that arbitration would defeat the remedial purposes of section 440.205. And AVI claims that it was entitled to arbitration because it otherwise satisfied all the elements of arbitrability. We agree with both points and reverse.

In April 2012, Spiessbach filed a complaint alleging that AVI’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Seifert v. US Home Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. Raymond James Financial v. SaldukasSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  3. Smith v. Piezo Technology & Prof. Adm'rsSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  4. Shotts v. OP Winter Haven, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2011
  5. Ronbeck Const. Co., Inc. v. Savanna Club Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. AMS Staff Leasing, Inc. v. Robert F. Taylor and Diamond K Resources3District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  2. AMS Staff Leasing, Inc. v. Robert F. Taylor and Diamond K Resources, LLC, a limited liability companyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  3. Bell v. Allied Universal SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2023
  4. JOHAN F. HAGSTROM v. CO.FE.ME. USA MARINE EXHAUST, LLC, etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API