Legal Opinion
Chicago Insurance v. American Southern Insurance
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided May 10, 1967No. 42725, 42740PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hall, Judge.
The following provisions are pertinent and identical in each of the policies: The insurer agrees “to pay on behalf of the insured all sums which the insured shall become legally obligated to pay as damages because of: . . . ‘bodily injury,’ sustained by any person; . . . arising out of the ownership, maintenance or use of the owned automobile or any non-owned automobile.”
The policy provides that under the coverages for bodily injury and property damage liability “persons insured” include . . (a) with respect to the owned automobile, (1) the named insured ... (2) any other person…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- American Automobile Insurance Co. v. Republic Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
- Howe v. HoweSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1935
- Case v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1964
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
- Shaw v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Carolina Casualty Insurance Company v. Underwriters Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Joanna Garmany, by and Through Her Next Friends v. Mission Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- McClure v. Employers Mutual Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
- Transamerica Insurance v. Norfolk & Dedham Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
- Zurich Insurance v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.