Legal Opinion
Gamradt v. Dubois
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 2, 1930No. 27,837PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
The action is for malpractice causing the death of plaintiff’s intestate, Albert Gamradt. Plaintiff recovered a verdict, which however on appeal to this court was vacated ancj a new trial awarded. Gamradt v. DuBois, 176 Minn. 312, 223 N. W. 296. The new trial resulted again in favor of plaintiff, and defendant appeals from the order denying his motion in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.’
In the afternoon of Saturday, October 10, 1925, Albert Gamradt, a farmer living within four miles of Sauk Center, this state, in operating a threshing rig, had his right…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Staloch v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Berkholz v. BenepeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Rippe v. Chicago, Dubuque & Minnesota RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
- Gamradt v. DuboisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cruz Rodríguez v. Corporación de Servicios del Centro MédicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1983
- Estate of Smith Ex Rel. Smith v. LernerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
- Nelson v. Nicollet ClinicSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Ouellette Ex Rel. Ouellette v. SubakCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Ouellette Ex Rel. Ouellette v. SubakCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986