Legal Opinion

McRae v. Smart

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1907PublishedCited by 2 opinions

FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Davidson County. —John Allison, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McAlister

*416This is a bill to enforce the specific performance of the following contract:

“Be it known that Briney Smart, party of the-first part, and W. D. McRae, party of the second part, both residents of Nashville, Davidson county, Tennessee, have this day covenanted and agreed with each other that they will abide by the following contract, to wit:
“Said party of the first part agrees and here gives to the said party of the second part one-half interest in patent covering an invention completed by said party of the first part, one complete half of entire patent which he had a good right to convey; that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gayler v. WilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  2. Dalzell v. Dueber Watch Case Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Kennedy v. HazeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Hartshorn v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1857
  5. Somerby v. BuntinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cincinnati, Bluffton & Chicago Railroad v. WallIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Slimmer v. MartinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API