Granite Construction Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LYDON, Senior Judge:
This Wunderlich Act review case is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. The court must decide whether the Corps of Engineers Board of Contract Appeals (ENGBCA or Board) erred in finding that the contractor Granite Construction Company (Granite) was not entitled to recover damages claimed for removal and replacement of non-conforming materials on a concrete *832lock and dam under construction. After consideration of the parties’ submissions and oral argument, heard on April 12,1991, the court grants defendant’s motion for summary judgment,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Smithkline Diagnostics, Inc. v. Helena Laboratories Corporation, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Hol-Gar Manufacturing Corp. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Erickson Air Crane Company of Washington, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Granite Construction Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992