Legal Opinion
Neal v. Still
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided June 22, 1970No. 5-5268PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lyle Brown, Justice.
Joe Neal and wife were formally charged, tried, and convicted in the Arkadelphia Municipal Court with willfully violating Ark. Stat. Ann. § 41-1431 (Repl. 1964), titled “Creating Disturbance on School Property.” The charges stemmed from their activities on the campus of Henderson State College. The pertinent point on appeal here is that the statute is unconstitutional.
An appeal to the circuit court was not perfected. Appellants filed in that court a petition which named the municipal judge, Hon. J. E. Still, as the respondent. The petition was styled, “Petition for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Terminiello v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Edwards v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Collins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- Wenderoth v. City of Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
- Collins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- Convention Center Referendum Committee v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & EthicsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Convention Center Referendum Committee v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & EthicsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.