Battice v. Michaelis
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHughes, J.
Appellant Friede contends that Michaelis was negligent as a matter of law with respect to both speed and lookout.
The southwest corner of the intersection, which was between the two vehicles as they approached each other, is occupied by a building which makes it a so-called “blind corner.”
Michaelis testified that as he approached the intersection he observed the traffic light on the northeast corner and that it was green for traffic on Regent street; that he continued to observe this light, and that it remained green until he was into the intersection and,, in fact, until he was struck by the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Zindell v. Central Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Teas v. EisenlordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Wilson v. KochWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942