Legal Opinion
Dagher v. Saudi Refining Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 1, 2004No. 02-56509PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs Fouad N. Dagher, et ah, appeal from the district court’s award of summary judgment to the defendants, Texaco, Inc., Shell Oil Co., and Saudi Refining, Inc. (SRI), et al. The plaintiffs represent a class of 23,000 Texaco and Shell service station owners who allege that the defendants conspired to fix the nationwide prices for the Shell and Texaco brands of gasoline through the creation of a national alliance consisting of two joint ventures. The district court granted two summary judgment motions: one to dismiss defendant SRI because the plaintiffs lacked…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Starr v. Sony BMG Music EntertainmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Texaco Inc. v. DagherSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Brennan v. Concord EFS, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2005
- Medical Supply Chain, Inc. v. Neoforma, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2006
- United States v. Daily Gazette Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.