Legal Opinion

Grable v. Damar Production Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 25, 1965No. Civ. 29089PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKingsley, J.

Plaintiff, a mortgagee in possession of certain real property, brought an action to foreclose the mortgage. On August 3, 1964, the court entered a judgment, fixing the sums due and owing from defendants to plaintiff, as of October 20, 1963, directing a sale of the property, and specifying the distribution of the proceeds of sale. Inasmuch as a substantial period of time had already intervened, and it was clear that more must necessarily intervene, before the sale could be accomplished, the judgment reserved jurisdiction in the court to adjust the ultimate liability between the parties by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zappettini v. BucklesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Perry v. West Coast Bond & Mortgage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Price v. SlawterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kinoshita v. HorioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  2. Degnan v. MorrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Kinsmith Financial Corp. v. GilroyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Reynolds v. Special Projects, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Heller Properties, Inc. v. RothschildCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API