Legal Opinion

Abdo v. Mullen

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 30, 1935No. 25447PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

At the time this action arose the plaintiff in error was operating a dairy farm and had as one of his employees the defendant in error. The defendant in error was a laborer, his dut'es consisting of milking cows, washing milk bottles, -cleaning up the -dairy barn, and dc-ing- general work of that nature around the premises. The plaintiff in error himself also worked at the dairy performing ihe same kind of duties that were performed by his employees. On the date of the accident involved the parties were engaged jointly in repairing a cream separator. The defendant in error '.was holding the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Solts v. Southwestern Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Northup v. EakesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Ponca City Ice Co. v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. SnowdenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. StantonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Angelly Ex Rel. AngellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  2. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Angelly Ex Rel. AngellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API