Legal Opinion

Blanton v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 16, 1914No. Nos. 3945, 3946PublishedCited by 21 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri; Arba S. Van Valkenburgh, Judge. W. E. Blanton and W. W. Chinn were convicted of using the mails in aid of a scheme to defraud, and they separately bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

HOOK, Circuit Judge.

W. E. Blanton, W. W. Chinn, Thomas A. Wakefield, and T. A. Wakefield, Jr., were jointly indicted for using the mails in aid of a scheme to defraud and to obtain money by false and fraudulent pretenses contrary to section 21-5 of the Penal Code. The Wakefields pleaded guilty. Blanton and Chinn were tried, convicted, and sentenced, and they separately prosecuted these writs of error. Another party who was discharged at the trial is excluded from the list of defendants. The assignments of error which merit notice may be grouped according to the general subjects to which they…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Agnew v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Fitzpatrick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. St. Clair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Brooks v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  5. Ayers v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Preeman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1917
  2. Lennon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  3. State v. HolbrookOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Chambers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
  5. Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. FelgenhauerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API