Legal Opinion

McGowen v. Second Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 2018No. 73312PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, HARDESTY, J.:

Petitioner Jim McGowen *222was served with a summons and complaint by the attorney or an employee of the plaintiff's counsel. In this writ proceeding, we must determine whether a plaintiff's attorney or the employee of a plaintiff's attorney may serve a summons and complaint on a defendant. Based on the plain language of NRCP 4(c) and federal decisions interpreting the federal analog to Nevada's rule, we conclude that a plaintiff's attorney or an employee of the attorney may serve a summons and complaint; thus, we deny McGowen's petition.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

McGow…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. International Game Technology, Inc. v. Second Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Smith v. Eighth Judicial District Court of State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Cote v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Executive Management, Ltd. v. Ticor Title InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Cheung v. Eighth Judicial District Court of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. THE RUMFORD FREE CATHOLIC LIBRARY v. TOWN OF RUMFORDDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API