McGowen v. Second Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, HARDESTY, J.:
Petitioner Jim McGowen *222was served with a summons and complaint by the attorney or an employee of the plaintiff's counsel. In this writ proceeding, we must determine whether a plaintiff's attorney or the employee of a plaintiff's attorney may serve a summons and complaint on a defendant. Based on the plain language of NRCP 4(c) and federal decisions interpreting the federal analog to Nevada's rule, we conclude that a plaintiff's attorney or an employee of the attorney may serve a summons and complaint; thus, we deny McGowen's petition.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
McGow…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- International Game Technology, Inc. v. Second Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Smith v. Eighth Judicial District Court of State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1997
- Cote v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Executive Management, Ltd. v. Ticor Title InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 2002
- Cheung v. Eighth Judicial District Court of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- THE RUMFORD FREE CATHOLIC LIBRARY v. TOWN OF RUMFORDDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2020