Legal Opinion

Fitts v. Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co.

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided June 2, 1920No. 139-3053PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCLENDON, J.

C. I. Pitts, the plaintiff, recovered judgment against the Panhandle & Santa Pé Railway Company, defendant, for the loss of his eye, alleged to have been caused by the actionable negligence of defendant. Among other defenses to the suit, defendant pleaded a release in full, the recited consideration whereof being: “An order on the treasurer of said company for $1, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,” and “the promise of said company to employ me for one day as trucker at the usual rate of pay, the execution thereof being conclusive evidence that said company has made me such…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Quebe v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. 1464-Eight, Ltd. v. JoppichTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Franks v. Brookshire Bros., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1999
  3. Reinhardt v. Tommy Burns Painting & Decorating Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  4. 1464-Eight, Ltd. v. JoppichTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  5. 1464-Eight, Ltd., a Texas Limited Partnership and Millis Management Corporation v. Gail Ann JoppichTexas Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API