Legal Opinion

Franks v. Brookshire Bros., Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided February 18, 1999No. 09-97-183 CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOHN HILL, Justice (Assigned).

Mark Franks appeals from a summary judgment that he take nothing in his personal injury action against his employer, Brook-shire Brothers, Inc., an action resulting from an on-the-job injury. Brookshire is a non-subscriber that did not have a policy of worker’s compensation insurance. In three points of error, Franks contends that the trial court erred in granting the summary judgment because: (1) a release executed by him does not apply to the injuries he sustained for which he seeks damages; (2) there is no consideration or insufficient consideration to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Humphreys v. CaldwellTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. CRC-Evans Pipeline International, Inc. v. Myers, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1996
  4. Memorial Medical Center v. KeszlerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Hart v. Traders & General InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Texas Sting, Ltd. v. R.B. Foods, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002
  2. Federal Financial Co. v. Delgado, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999
  3. In the Interest of K.L.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2012
  4. In Re Estate of Browne, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2004
  5. Kevin Geheb v. TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API