Franks v. Brookshire Bros., Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOHN HILL, Justice (Assigned).
Mark Franks appeals from a summary judgment that he take nothing in his personal injury action against his employer, Brook-shire Brothers, Inc., an action resulting from an on-the-job injury. Brookshire is a non-subscriber that did not have a policy of worker’s compensation insurance. In three points of error, Franks contends that the trial court erred in granting the summary judgment because: (1) a release executed by him does not apply to the injuries he sustained for which he seeks damages; (2) there is no consideration or insufficient consideration to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Humphreys v. CaldwellTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- CRC-Evans Pipeline International, Inc. v. Myers, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1996
- Memorial Medical Center v. KeszlerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Hart v. Traders & General InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Texas Sting, Ltd. v. R.B. Foods, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002
- Federal Financial Co. v. Delgado, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999
- In the Interest of K.L.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2012
- In Re Estate of Browne, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2004
- Kevin Geheb v. TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.